Prioritise the right sites before crews set out

Know which sites need attention first

Conditions can change across a portfolio between scheduled visits. Compare monitored areas remotely, direct crews to the sites that need attention and maintain more consistent landscapes with fewer surprises.

Moroccan-style landscaped courtyard with seating and a water feature

The multi-property service challenge

A fixed visit schedule cannot show which site changed

Visibility across properties

Teams cannot see which commercial site changed after the last visit without returning to inspect it.

Travel and routine checks

Uniform visit schedules consume travel and labour even when some properties remain stable and others need earlier attention.

Dry and oversaturated areas

Dry, oversaturated and poorly draining areas can develop between visits and become visible only after the problem has progressed.

Inconsistent presentation

Different conditions across a portfolio make it harder to maintain a consistent standard at every property.

Weather changes the plan

Rain and temperature can change irrigation and maintenance priorities after crews have already been scheduled.

Different irrigation systems

Reviewing schedules and outcomes across properties is difficult when each site has different equipment and routines.

Compare the portfolio before crews set out

Compare properties remotely

Review moisture, temperature and EC across selected landscape areas in the Portal.

Adjust visit priorities

Place weather context beside site trends and direct crews to properties where conditions have changed.

Keep shared service records

Where compatible controllers are connected, act on configured thresholds and record irrigation outcomes, saved runtime and saved litres when flow-rate data is configured.

Target crew visits

Set soil-moisture threshold alerts so teams can prioritise selected areas that need closer inspection.

Which properties consume the most inspection and travel time?

Plan a portfolio trial